If… Then… Writing Interactive Narrative

The defining feature of an interactive narrative is active user participation: you must have a story, but your reader must participate in its progress or outcome. As we’ve seen from our reading, there are a variety of ways to engage your readers in your narrative, and a spectrum of how deeply you allow that reader input to penetrate the narrative.

Your next assignment will be to write your own interactive narrative that grapples with this paradox. To do so, you must first choose a story, and then choose an interactive structure, all the while making careful choices about the degree of user participation you are willing to sacrifice for the sake of narrative coherence.


Your interactive narrative may take the form of fiction, poetry, or nonfiction. You may choose to tell a personal story, to put forth a persuasive argument, or to create an informative experience. Whatever content you choose, you will also have to plan the medium (interactive fiction? hypertext? game?) and the level of interactivity your narrative will possess.

Since I’d like you all to move beyond a peripheral narrative, as Marie-Laure Ryan defines it, here are some starting off points:

  • Create a hypertext narrative that follows a “network” structure, with a finite collection of text components that allows the reader to progress through the narrative segments in a variety of ways (by linking various webpages through hyperlinks).
  • Create a  hypertext narrative in a tree structure, like a “Choose Your Own Adventure,” story using a software such as Twine, in which the user manipulates the text but has limited effect on the narrative events; these narratives should therefore have a stronger story component.
  • Create a game in which the reader plays a character in the story and has an avatar in the world of the story, in the form of a quest narrative or detective / mystery story. In this form, you may make use of dialogue systems or cut scenes to progress the narrative, but the user’s choices should produce a variation on the fixed narrative frame.
  • For most of us, an emergent story generated on the fly out of data that comes in part from a system and in part from a user, is beyond our technical ability. But if you’re interested in a more bottom-up structural approach and can envision how to make it happen, feel free. One option would be to create an embodied interactive experience using physical materials in the real world, set up within some kind of narrative constraint, and film / record / document your participants interaction with those materials to create a narrative experience (such as Camille Utterback’s video installation piece, “Text Rain”).

Whichever option you choose, I want you to think carefully about the central concerns of interactive narratives raised by Emily Short and Marie Laure-Ryan: how will your piece be satisfying in terms of narrative, and in terms of player participation / agency?


Will you constrain player agency and make that constraint a part of the narrative? Will you center the interactive component on challenging what the player-reader feels comfortable doing? Will you task your reader with overcoming obstacles and solving puzzles, to create a sense of agency even if only to uncover more data? Or will your narrative be focused more on deep exploration or responding to the text as a prose object (like the interactive poetry app Abra), eschewing traditional narrative arcs?

In Tuesday’s class, you all experienced different versions of this central balancing act by engaging with a few interactive narratives. Here are some of your observations in terms of what you enjoyed as a reader / player:

  • Structure that still allows for exploration
  • Relative freedom
  • Allowed creativity
  • Degree of control
  • A compelling story

These are the criteria for this assignment; how will you work to make your reader enjoy this experience? I don’t expect you to hit every mark, or avoid every frustration, but to think about balance, and make careful choices.

As we said, interactive narratives require LOTS of planning and structural diagramming before you can begin building the text machine. It’s important, then, to think about your story arc, characters, choices, and outcomes, and to generate a detailed map of story before you begin working with software.

Next Tuesday’s class will be a work day, to allow you maximum time to prepare your narrative. Next Thursday, you all will provide feedback on working drafts of each other’s interactive narratives, which will be due in final form by Friday, March 29th. As with your previous projects, you will hand in your interactive narrative via next week’s blog post. These projects will be graded just on completion, so take advantage of that to take risks and think big!

Your reflection for this assignment (which will serve as Blog #11) should be a 500-1000 word detailed reflection on the process of creating your interactive narrative. You should discuss what inspired the narrative, how the form and content work together, what was challenging / fun about the process of creation, what artistic choices you made while constructing the project and why, what advantages the medium offered, and what you learned from this process that you will carry with you when you leave this class.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s